![]() |
DIVISION OF HUMANITIES |
Returning your Unit Grades:
How to Do
It
[Part
1]
June 2007
Marking and grading within the Division is
departmentally-based: in the first instance, grades are collated and approved by
Departments before being submitted to the Division. All examiners and markers
should read the following material carefully.
FOR POSTGRADUATE UNITS [Part 2]
APPENDICES:
LIST OF AUTHORISED GRADES
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR I GRADES
1 If you are an examiner (that is, the convenor of a unit) then you are responsible for seeing that the scores for your students are returned to your Department Administrator for entering in the Student One exams module.
You may return your results as a spreadsheet on disk, or in printed form. You can download your classlist from StudentOne - import them as Excel files; or check with your Department Administrator to see if there is a list already downloaded for you.
You should return your results in the form of raw scores to your DA as soon as you have completed marking - do not wait until departmental exam meetings. (And remember, there is no need to convert them to percentages - assuming you have ensured, as we recommend, that your assignment marks do not total 100.) Attach the Unit Results Return cover sheet. There you will find two sections:
Section A has space to record where the cutoffs lie for each of the grades (see Section 2 below), and (for undergraduate units only) space to record the top 3 placegetters.
Section B
provides information for our Assessment Quality Database, which will assist the
Division when it meets to recommend our Grade Distributions to Academic
Senate.
2 The basic guide for grading is ...
the advice originally circulated to Humanities staff in February 2001 and now revised to incorporate the latest University policy. It is currently available at http://www.humanities.mq.edu.au/MQUonly/new_grades.html
Make sure you have a copy handy, and refer to it if in any doubt.
In advising your DA of the grade cut-offs,
the distribution of grades shown in Table 1 below should normally apply
if your unit has a total enrolment of 40 or more. (Note that the percentages
are of all grades.)
HD | D | Cr | |
100 level | 3% ± 2% | 11% ±4% | 23% ± 5% |
200 level | 3% ± 2% | 12% ± 4% | 25% ± 5% |
300 level | 4% ± 2% | 14% ± 4% | 28% ± 5% |
400/500 level | 5% ± 2% | 20% ± 4% | 40% ± 5% |
800 level & above | 8% ± 5% | 20% ± 10% | 45% ± 15% |
Units with 40 or more students would not normally expect to fail more than 20% of the candidature.
3 The grades that you award (or, strictly, recommend) must be taken from the list below. Note that you can't enter FW, W or NE - these are administrative grades recommended after consultation between the Registrar and Dean.
If your department accepts your grades,
and the Division concurs, then they are certified by the Dean and sent to Academic
Senate for consideration at its Special Meeting. (It is possible, though rare,
for Senate to reject our recommended grades.)
4
If the grade distribution you wish to recommend for a unit is outside the tolerances given in table 1 above (the primary guideline) and the Record of Previous Performance (secondary guideline), you will need to present a written justification (300 words or fewer) to your Head of Department prior to your Departmental examiners' meeting. Providing a written justification is important because it allows those who consider your recommendations at Departmental, Divisional and Senate level to know the educational rationale for your decisions. In your justification, student performance should be considered against unit objectives and assessment criteria (relevant sections from the unit guide may be appended). Validation for your comments should also be provided in the form of (a) samples of student work; and, or (b) evidence of consultation about your recommendations with another staff member in your discipline or a cognate area.
5
Requests for Special Consideration
You may receive requests from
students for special consideration; some of these might claim "unavoidable
disruption" such that the students cannot complete work in time or sit for the
scheduled examination.
7 After
your departmental exam meeting grade distributions will be collated and submitted
to the Division, for consideration at the Special Examination Meeting of the
Division on 4 July 2007 at 11.00 am in W6A 107.
8 Undergraduate Committee/Standing Committee will meet on the morning of 11 July 2007 at 10.00 am in W6A 107 to make late recommendations on results. Please make yourself available to resolve any queries on your grades. If you do not plan to be in your room that day, please leave your contact number with the Department Administrator and make sure that you have attendance rolls, assignment marks etc. by the phone with you. If you would like to attend Undergrad Committee, you'd be welcome - consider yourself invited.
Ideally, there should be a formal and central record in your department of the marks of each of your students. But at Undergrad Committee, we may require your particular advice on whether a student should be permitted to graduate, or whether you were aware of a student's illness, and so on.
Back to top of page